LTE, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC -- all of these wireless technologies are wonderful and useful in their own way. Unfortunately, they're incompatible with one another.
Mobile devices require unique wireless chips for every wireless protocol they use. And if a new wireless technology rolls around, it almost always includes the need to upgrade to a different piece of hardware. This is not only cost prohibitive, it also slows new wireless protocols from catching on more rapidly. But tying wireless protocols to specific hardware chips may soon be a thing of the past. And the ease of faster adoption to more advanced wireless protocols may mean the elimination of frequent wireless hardware upgrades simply to move to the next generation of wireless protocols.
A company called Per Vices has recently introduced new software-defined radio technology to eliminate the need for costly upgrades. The concept is simple as the goal would be that user end devices would be required to house a single wireless transmitter and receiver. Today, my smartphone has four wireless chips -- one for cellular, one for WiFi, and two for personal area network (PAN) connectivity. That's really not efficient as a single radio chip could in theory handle all these functions simultaneously.
Additionally, most cellular chips in phones are hard wired to only operate over anywhere from one to four cellular frequencies, depending on the chipset. So when you want to use your phone in a different country or even with a different wireless carrier, it may not be compatible. But if a chip could be software programmable to transmit at different frequencies on the fly, your formally locked-in phone suddenly becomes universal. This would open up all kinds of possibilities for companies in terms of world compatibility and the ability to move from one carrier to another.
I've written in the past about new and emerging WiFi technologies and the difficulties that come along with those upgrades. I have also performed multiple enterprise upgrades, going from 802.11b to 802.11g, and finally to the latest generation of 802.11n hardware. Each time, the wireless access points and the wireless end devices required hardware upgrades in order to take advantage of the latest and greatest protocol.
It's interesting to think of a future where new wireless protocols could be upgraded with a simple software update. And just as intriguing would be the ability to move from one cellular frequency to the next, completely eliminating carrier operating frequency restrictions. Companies such as Per Vices are really onto a technology that would be immediately useful in one regard and incredibly cost conscious in another. That's a win-win combination that should interest all of us.
Companies such as Per Vices are really onto a technology that would be immediately useful in one regard and incredibly cost conscious in another.
It's a nice idea....but the cell companies don't necessarily want to make life more affordable for the masses--at least they don't act like it. If anything, they continue to try to skewer people (make money) wherever possible.
Lets say Landline companies stop providing services in all but the Densest parts of the country;what happens next?
Do consumers rebel and take companies to court?
Can they win?
Its a well known fact that in most of the Interior/sparsely populated parts of America,Wireless services are not very good/patchy and so if you force these consumers to use patchy Wireless services ;I don't think they are gonna taking it too kindly.
But the if you look at your Socio-Economic Status;you and your family are reasonably well to do(in what is known as the Middle Class) and in the Prime of your Earning years.
In contrast look at someone who has just retired and has to survive on Fixed Incomes.For such people;its become increasingly difficult to get by today;primarily because of the Zero percent Interest rate policies of the Fed.
Food ,Gas and Utility costs continue to rise,while the Pension stream stays the same.
This is where the majority of Pay As you Go plans are going to be launched in the future now.
With increasing numbers of Baby Boomers retiring every single day and also the fact that most of the so-called Rebound Generation not getting Steady and well paying jobs;people in this demographic group are going to have no choice but to start cutting back on Unneccesary Luxuries and avoidable expenditures like Super-expensive Monthly plans.
One of the things those land line companes are trying to do to help their bottom lines is get states to drop their requirements to serve rural areas. the cost of servcing and running those lines (where there is often no cell coverage) is a drag. At the same time, ihope governments don't give in and take valuable services away from people who happen to choose not to live in the burbs.
@eethtworkz- Pay as you go is an interesting bird, at least in the US. 80% of new phone subscriptions are pay as you go. But nearly all of those are people activating phones or smart phones for the first time.
There aren't too many people switching from contracts to pay as you go. I can't honestly tell you the reason other than that I personally like my data plan and i don't want to lose it.
I also would rather pay a little more per month and know I won't get hit with a big charge on a busy month.
I can't say whether that is the reason, but it MY reason.
this might be the advantage pay as you go has though that might change the game.
I am surprised given how intense the Recession has been to-date and especially since Pension payouts are'nt really getting any better[Thanks primarily to the Fed's Zero Interest rate policy),more people are'nt making the same decision you made here.
After all,180 Dolllars of savings made every month is a big deal,even here in America today .
The blogs and comments posted on EnterpriseEfficiency.com do not reflect the views of TechWeb, EnterpriseEfficiency.com, or its sponsors. EnterpriseEfficiency.com, TechWeb, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Enterprise Efficiency is looking for engaged readers to moderate the message boards on this site. Engage in high-IQ conversations with IT industry leaders; earn kudos and perks. Interested? E-mail: [email protected]
Dell's Efficiency Modeling Tool The major problem facing the CIO is how to measure the effectiveness of the IT department. Learn how Dell’s Efficiency Modeling Tool gives the CIO two clear, powerful numbers: Efficiency Quotient and Impact Quotient. These numbers can be transforma¬tive not only to the department, but to the entire enterprise. Read the full report
Now that TGen has broken new ground in genomic research by using Dell's storage, cloud, and high-performance computing solutions, the company discusses what will come next for it and for personalized medicine.
The Translational Genomics Research Institute wanted to save lives, but its efforts were hobbled by immense computing challenges related to collecting, processing, sharing, and storing enormous amounts of data.
Office and personal productivity tools come in a first-class and coach flavor set, but what makes the difference is primarily little things that most users won't encounter. What's the big issue in using something other than Office, and can you get around it?
We really don't want an "Internet of Everything" but even building an Internet of Everythinguseful means setting some ground rules to insure there's value in the process and that costs and risks are minimized.
Google's Chrome OS has a lot of potential value and a lot of recent press, but it still needs something to make it more than a thin client. It needs cloud integration, it needs extended APIs via web services, and it needs to suck it up and support a hard drive.
On a recent African trip I saw examples of the value of the cloud in developing nations, for educational and community development programs. We could build on this, but not only in developing economies, because these same programs are often under-supported even in first-world countries.
VMware's debate with Cisco on SDN might finally create a fusion between an SDN view that's all about software and another that's all about network equipment. That would be good for every enterprise considering the cloud and SDN.
Wearing a bulky, oversized watch is good training for the next phase in wristwatches: the Internet-enabled, connected watch. Why the smartphone-tethered connected watch makes sense, plus Ivan demos an entirely new concept for the "smart watch."
Cloud storage costs are determined primarily by the rate at which files are changed and the possibility of concurrent access/update. If you can structure your storage use to optimize these factors you can cut costs, perhaps to zero.
The Internet has evolved into a machine for drumming up a chorus of "Happy Birthday" messages, from family, friends, friends of friends who you added on Facebook, random people that you circled on G+, and increasingly, automated bots. Enough already.