@Sara Incredible. It will be interesting to see what happens next. I would think the U.S. tries him in the British courts which have already shown their disposition towards the issue. Might just have to content with monitoring is every movement into perpetuity.
This is just an example, but people here are beggining to look at the possibility that the UK will try to stop sending its citizens abroad to be tried for similar crimes -something unthinkable in most European countries.
@mejiac, absolutely. The thing is, too, that that's just one example of the kind of thing we're dealing with - it could get a lot worse than that, especially given a few years for cloud and the like to develop! Those steps (or their equivalence) could happen in any order, and solving that specific puzzle doesn't help international law organizations all that much.
Even if one country has it figured out, that doesn't help us when that country isn't involved in a given case. Not only do the laws need to be reformed from the ground up, but international governments need to co-operate in a very fundamental way that they haven't before. Maybe co-operate isn't the right word; it might be better for individual rights if they don't - but the rules need to be established.
Let's paint a picture: You have a US base company seeking cloud services from a company in the UK, but then servers are located in Ireland. Then someone makes an attack from Spain to the servers in Ireland.... it's a jurisdiction nightmare!
And even more so with everyday cloud solutions being offered. As has been mentioned on this site various times, security and safety of data is a major concern. I guess this goes to show that we got a long way to go, and we're literally paving the road as we go.
@zerox I agree with you that cross-border cyber crime is one of the greatest challenges the legal system has been faced with in a very, very, long time. The thing is, most cybercrime is really just regular crime that happens to be committed by way of using computer systems. So maybe the laws don't need to change at all. We don't need new laws to fight cybercrime. We just need to establish some law enforcement procedures and some acknowledgement of the fact that the geographic boundaries that exist in the physical world simply don't exist in the virtual world.
You're right, Mejiac. Thinking of this as a small window of opportunity or a minor niche, as soom do, is really missing the point. We're talking about a huge issue that will affect our everyday lives in the near future. Of course, most of use the internet on a daily basis already, but that only goes to show how deeply rooted it will be in everything we and our governments do in the next five or ten years.
Cyber crime will be extremely possible and extremely lucrative on it's own. The ability to hit targets all over the world without moving, under a veil of secrecy is a criminal's dream come true. Once you mix in the fact that the laws for prosecuting those who are caught are muddy at best, all bets are off. This issue can't be tackled soon enough.
Enterprise Efficiency is looking for engaged readers to moderate the message boards on this site. Engage in high-IQ conversations with IT industry leaders; earn kudos and perks. Interested? E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Now that TGen has broken new ground in genomic research by using Dell's storage, cloud, and high-performance computing solutions, the company discusses what will come next for it and for personalized medicine.
The Translational Genomics Research Institute wanted to save lives, but its efforts were hobbled by immense computing challenges related to collecting, processing, sharing, and storing enormous amounts of data.
Nasdaq OMX is being investigated by Swedish competition authorities as to whether it pressured Verizon to keep a competing exchange called Burgundy from collocating in the same datacenter as its biggest customers.