Good points! The problem of buyer literacy on the cloud and on how it differs from virtualization (or doesn't) impacts the users' ability to plan for the cloud and also the selection of optimum products.
At some point, IMHO, the cloud has to leave virtualization behind at a conceptual/service level. That means that the role virtualization plays is one of maximizing efficiency in certain specialized situations; the cloud has to be an answer to efficiency in ALL situations. Thus, virtualiztaion becomes a way of making the cloud work. Same for networking. We can visualize a cloud without virtual-network-based partitions, particularly for individual enterprise private clouds. But how do these clouds connect with public hosting or each other? We may need to define a new notion of a virtual network.
I think that's the exact question that HP is wrestling with! There are benefits to network virtualization in abstract, but making those benefits into something that actually funds a project and some purchases isn't automatic. Users today still don't think of the cloud properly according to my surveys, and that makes HP's job of promotion a lot harder.
People don't want to hear 'interdependance' when it comes to Cloud and Virtualization. They're supposed to be magic buttons where nothing ever goes wrong, and, if it does, you can lay the blame out there in the ether instead of on yourself. The thought that they have to be managed and maintained like anything else is a buzzkill. Of course, it's also the truth.
As you point out, there's a positive spin to this. If you accept this reality and do a good job with that maintainance, you can see gains in your cloud productivity. Those are the folks who are going to be happy with their investment.
You really touch on the core of the issue here, Tom. You don't want to build a cloud infrastructure just for the sake of doing it - you want it to give you some kind of capability you don't have with your existing datacenter, or that you wouldn't have had if you built a regular datacenter.
Maybe Network Virtualization of the type HP is suggesting is a way to do that, and maybe it isn't. If it isn't, then we're just back to square one - scrambling to make it look like we came up with something new when we never had to. Stacking that problem on top of itself is only going to make things that much worse, so let's hope for some useful applications.
Please join us for the "IT Convergence Strategies: Why, When and How " to learn more about:
• 5 truths about infrastructure convergence today that go beyond the hype
• How to exploit the 4 phases of convergence maximum efficiency and agility
• Key milestones to plan for on the convergence journey
• Why integrated management is a critical component of convergence plans
• The importance of an open, modular approach, such as Dell’s active infrastructure, to building a converged data center
Enterprise Efficiency is looking for engaged readers to moderate the message boards on this site. Engage in high-IQ conversations with IT industry leaders; earn kudos and perks. Interested? E-mail: email@example.com
Dell's Efficiency Modeling Tool The major problem facing the CIO is how to measure the effectiveness of the IT department. Learn how Dell’s Efficiency Modeling Tool gives the CIO two clear, powerful numbers: Efficiency Quotient and Impact Quotient. These numbers can be transforma¬tive not only to the department, but to the entire enterprise. Read the full report
Now that TGen has broken new ground in genomic research by using Dell's storage, cloud, and high-performance computing solutions, the company discusses what will come next for it and for personalized medicine.
The Translational Genomics Research Institute wanted to save lives, but its efforts were hobbled by immense computing challenges related to collecting, processing, sharing, and storing enormous amounts of data.
There's a lot of hype about virtualization of networks, NaaS, and SDN, but there's a couple of proven applications that enterprises could adopt right now and potentially save money and improve operations.
Skype/Outlook UC integration means we're going to have competition and fragmentation of UC client architectures, but is that bad? Modern devices can support IM, email, voice, and video clients, so maybe it's the back end of UC we need to be worried about.
Workers are now used to portable device support throughout their everyday lives. We should be looking at the policy of providing fixed-desk devices to support stationary workers. Could portable support be smarter?
Input devices run the gamut, from the humble Missile Command-style trackball to advanced speech recognition. Unfortunately, these input devices can be used for evil as well as good. Case in point: mobile ads that want you to talk to them.
Enterprises want three things in storage systems: First is some speech-recognition way of capturing videoconference data for indexing; second is semantic/AI analysis of emails and IM for content indexing; third is a better system for managing hierarchical layers of storage.