While Americans vote in their general election today, a perhaps more interesting election happened this past weekend.
The Canadian city of Edmonton, Alberta (pop. 817,498) asked people to vote on their favorite color jelly bean. They asked them to register to vote as usual but instead of going to a polling station, that asked people to use their computer to vote securely and confidentially over the Internet, selecting their favorite color. While this seems silly, the goal was to test Scytl's Internet voting solution.
Once a voter's registration has been accepted, the voter is issued a Personal Identification Number (PIN) that is required in order to vote in the Jellybean Election. Voting took place between 8:00 a.m. MST on October 22nd and 12:00 p.m. MST on November 2nd. Results were announced shortly after the election (red won) and every voter can verify that his or her ballot has been counted using a special code embedded in the secure envelope. Here's a video on how they hoped it would go:
It is too early to tell how things went, but a report is due in January 2013 that will detail how the voting process fared. We hope to follow up then. So far, things seem to have gone very well.
Laura Kennedy, director of elections for the City of Edmonton, said:
We are very excited about this innovative, fun and
true-to-life mock election that we are undertaking using Scytl's system. Our next General Election will take place on October 21, 2013. Therefore, we want to get as much information as possible on the security, usability and other attributes of Scytl's internet voting solution as well as general feedback from voters on
their comfort level in using internet voting as an option during next year's General Election.
Meanwhile, for the US presidential election, the State of Alaska has gone the extra mile, allowing all of its citizens to register online, fill out their voting ballots online, and send them back as electronic documents over the Internet.
But Alaska is not using a complete Internet voting platform -- what they are doing is letting people use the Internet to register, receive the voting ballot, mark their choices, and deliver the "paper ballot" over the Internet. Scytl has provided the technology, but does not manage the entire process, county officials do. Each printed ballot contains a certification code to ensure it comes from a registered voter and can only be used once.
Currently, a single comprehensive standard for developing and testing Internet voting systems does not exist. Pilot project sponsors often drew heavily from variety of standards and requirements to develop and implement Internet voting systems. The majority of systems were not developed
or tested to a single standard; often several standards, supplemented with additional requirements, were used.
Many countries, states, and counties used or are starting to
use some forms of electronic voting, and each have developed their
certification standards to choose a provider and solution.
It is very important that city, county, state, and federal
CIOs start looking at the technology seriously. In 2008, the State of Florida conducted a complete audit of Scytl's voting system for the absentee voters going through every line of the source code and certifying the solution.
Switzerland, where participative democracy is the norm, is
one of the countries were Internet voting has been used in several elections, including referendums. In the Canton of Neuchâtel, Internet voting has been used since 2004 to carry out from three to six citizen consultations, binding electoral processes and referendums each year, with over 60 percent of the votes cast via the Internet.
It is only a matter of time before Internet voting is the norm. But it will up to CIOs to test, implement, and secure Internet voting. Share your thoughts on the biggest hurdles to e-voting below.
It's great to see that a virtual solution for voting is been tested and not seen as something negative. Though there will always be people that want to feel of placing and submitting a ballot physically, a virtual solution allows for far greater accuracy, cost reduction (no need to set up so many voting locations) and speed of turn around.
So keep on testing. I personally submit my ballots through mail mostly because of the convenience (no lines).
I mean today if you're a stokeholder, proxies are voted online
That's interesting, I wonder how they combat voter fraud in that case? I'm assuming you could have gone to another precinct and voted there with just the name of someone who lives in the area. On a small scale that's not going to be very effective but an organized effort could easily change at least the local elections.
The US does it by being able to ask for personal information. I used to live in an area that didn't require a photo ID but was always asked for my address and SSN, not something you're likely to give to a friend.
I would imagine that for voting by web to work in the US they would make it a requirement that you will need to imput more than just your SSN or a voter reg number. I can forsee a situation where: your fingerprints are first placed into a central data base when you register to vote, then when it is time to vote, you'll need a fingerprint scanner of some sort on your computer to match your identity to what's in the database, or perhaps they will opt for facial recognition.
Then once you are positively identified, you will be able to cast your cyber ballot.
I can't see the US goverment allowing for a "just login here and we'll trust that you are you" type of setup.
I would love to see internet voting! I actually think it would be secure than what we have today. When I showed up to vote in NJ on Tuesday no one even asked for an id. I gave my name and address and I was given a ballot! On the web they could require specific information that would identify up as a registered voter and make the process more secure.
@SaneIT, I think voting is personal, nobody should be able to vote for you. Also the ID issue needs to be resolved. How is it possible the the US has millions of citizens without IDs? I know it is a hot political issue, but I believe a basic ID should be free and "required" to vote.
The blogs and comments posted on EnterpriseEfficiency.com do not reflect the views of TechWeb, EnterpriseEfficiency.com, or its sponsors. EnterpriseEfficiency.com, TechWeb, and its sponsors do not assume responsibility for any comments, claims, or opinions made by authors and bloggers. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
12/5/2013 - With the looming April 8th 2014 end-of-support date for Windows XP, IT departments are working to wrap up the move to Windows 7 and Windows 8. Yet at many organizations, lingering concerns about application compatibility are impeding the process.
Join us for a detailed, interactive webinar to hear expert advice on how to address application issues in your OS migration.
12/17/2013 - This webcast will show how you can:
-Transform your IT infrastructure by leveraging Dell’s OpenManage integrated with System Center, our Hyper-Scale technologies, and factory capabilities
-Connect with people-centric solutions with Dell Desktop Virtualization Solutions (DVS)
-Inform your users with business intelligence based on Dell deployment, applications like Boomi, and comprehensive reference architectures
Enterprise Efficiency is looking for engaged readers to moderate the message boards on this site. Engage in high-IQ conversations with IT industry leaders; earn kudos and perks. Interested? E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dell's Efficiency Modeling Tool The major problem facing the CIO is how to measure the effectiveness of the IT department. Learn how Dell’s Efficiency Modeling Tool gives the CIO two clear, powerful numbers: Efficiency Quotient and Impact Quotient. These numbers can be transforma¬tive not only to the department, but to the entire enterprise. Read the full report
Now that TGen has broken new ground in genomic research by using Dell's storage, cloud, and high-performance computing solutions, the company discusses what will come next for it and for personalized medicine.
The Translational Genomics Research Institute wanted to save lives, but its efforts were hobbled by immense computing challenges related to collecting, processing, sharing, and storing enormous amounts of data.
On a recent African trip I saw examples of the value of the cloud in developing nations, for educational and community development programs. We could build on this, but not only in developing economies, because these same programs are often under-supported even in first-world countries.
VMware's debate with Cisco on SDN might finally create a fusion between an SDN view that's all about software and another that's all about network equipment. That would be good for every enterprise considering the cloud and SDN.
Wearing a bulky, oversized watch is good training for the next phase in wristwatches: the Internet-enabled, connected watch. Why the smartphone-tethered connected watch makes sense, plus Ivan demos an entirely new concept for the "smart watch."
Cloud storage costs are determined primarily by the rate at which files are changed and the possibility of concurrent access/update. If you can structure your storage use to optimize these factors you can cut costs, perhaps to zero.
The Internet has evolved into a machine for drumming up a chorus of "Happy Birthday" messages, from family, friends, friends of friends who you added on Facebook, random people that you circled on G+, and increasingly, automated bots. Enough already.
Fedora Linux is launching a new model for structuring Linux distributions, a two-ring approach with core functions surrounded by special-interest-group customizations. This could streamline Linux to enhance its role in everything in our tech future.
For many users, lack of support is the only barrier to open-source adoption, and there are some strategies that can be used to get you support and one possible way of minimizing your need for it in the first place.
Who'd have thought? But the liaison is actually not only good for both companies, it's good for the cloud market, because it will promote the cloud to SMBs, and it's the little guys that will make or break the cloud of the future.
Google Glass certainly posed potential privacy risks, and there are considerations for its use by consumers, but we've let ourselves forget the profound benefits that augmented reality tools like Glass could bring to the workplace.